Talk:HD 100673

On 4 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from A Centauri to HD 100673. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 4 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 11:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Centauri → HD 100673
A Centauri (disambiguation) → A Centauri

– I don't see any reason why "A Centauri" should point to this star and not to the set index page disambiguating the two stars with the same name that only differs in capitalization. See also Talk:B Centauri. SevenSpheres (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are reasons, but none of them seem to apply here. There is a preference for the use of the Bayer designations which seems to have become stronger this century. I could speculate that Simbad has influenced people by choosing both "A Centauri" and "a Centauri" as the headline names for these stars. Of the two "a Centauri" is by far the primary topic, with barely any usages of "A Centauri". Comparison searches are complicated somewhat by both being chemically peculiar B-type stars, but I'm fairly confident that occurrences of "a Centauri" in journal papers are at least ten times more frequent than "A Centauri".

One wrinkle: A Centauri (disambiguation) shouldn't be left behind as a redirect to a set index page. Lithopsian (talk) 13:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.